[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR18MB52162B8D21B4F3037822901ADB739@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:46:00 +0000
From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Add egress PFC support
>> >> - schq = hw->txschq_list[lvl][0];
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DCB
>> >> + if (txschq_for_pfc)
>> >> + schq = pfvf->pfc_schq_list[lvl][prio];
>> >> + else
>> >> +#endif
>> >
>> >Please could you try to remove as many of these #ifdef CONFIG_DCB as
>> >possible. It makes build testing less efficient at finding build
>> >problems. Can you do:
>> >
>> >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DCB) && txschq_for_pfc)
>> >> + schq = pfvf->pfc_schq_list[lvl][prio];
>> >
>> [Suman] I will restructured the code. But we cannot use
>> pfvf->pfc_schq_list outside #ifdef CONFIG_DCB as these are defined
>> under the macro in otx2_common.h
>
>So maybe add a getter and setter in otx2_common.h, which returns -
>EOPNOTSUPP or similar when CONFIG_DCB is disabled?
>
> Andrew
[Suman] I have updated the patch and using CONFIG_DCB only once in the function. Can you please check if that should be okay?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists