[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220824125554.27901-1-yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 20:55:54 +0800
From: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
To: airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: fix repeated words in comments
Delete the redundant word 'to'.
Delete the redundant word 'should'.
Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
index d49de4905efa..82b9d33ecc84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int vmw_execbuf_res_noctx_val_add(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context,
}
/**
- * vmw_view_res_val_add - Add a view and the surface it's pointing to to the
+ * vmw_view_res_val_add - Add a view and the surface it's pointing to the
* validation list
*
* @sw_context: The software context holding the validation list.
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static int vmw_view_res_val_add(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context,
/**
* vmw_view_id_val_add - Look up a view and add it and the surface it's pointing
- * to to the validation list.
+ * to the validation list.
*
* @sw_context: The software context holding the validation list.
* @view_type: The view type to look up.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.h
index 1d1c8b82c898..7c04e8150fe2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.h
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct vmw_du_update_plane {
*
* Some surface resource or buffer object need some extra cmd submission
* like update GB image for proxy surface and define a GMRFB for screen
- * object. That should should be done here as this callback will be
+ * object. That should be done here as this callback will be
* called after FIFO allocation with the address of command buufer.
*
* This callback is optional.
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists