lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwYn8i6Gy58IKqGm@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:30:26 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf hashmap: Tidy hashmap dependency

Em Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:06:04PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> When libbpf is present the build uses definitions in libbpf hashmap.c,
> however, libbpf's hashmap.h wasn't being used. Switch to using the
> correct hashmap.h dependent on the define HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT. This
> was the original intent in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200515221732.44078-8-irogers@google.com/

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c |  6 +++++-
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c      |  6 +++++-
>  tools/perf/util/expr.h       | 11 ++++-------
>  tools/perf/util/stat.c       |  6 +++++-
>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> index e2052f4fed33..d657594894cf 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,11 @@
>  #include "util.h"
>  #include "llvm-utils.h"
>  #include "c++/clang-c.h"
> -#include "hashmap.h"
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> +#include <bpf/hashmap.h>
> +#else
> +#include "util/hashmap.h"
> +#endif
>  #include "asm/bug.h"
>  
>  #include <internal/xyarray.h>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 4852089e1d79..14846b7edb17 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,11 @@
>  #include "string2.h"
>  #include "memswap.h"
>  #include "util.h"
> -#include "hashmap.h"
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> +#include <bpf/hashmap.h>
> +#else
> +#include "util/hashmap.h"
> +#endif
>  #include "pmu-hybrid.h"
>  #include "off_cpu.h"
>  #include "../perf-sys.h"
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.h b/tools/perf/util/expr.h
> index bd2116983bbb..0403a92d9dcc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.h
> @@ -2,14 +2,11 @@
>  #ifndef PARSE_CTX_H
>  #define PARSE_CTX_H 1
>  
> -// There are fixes that need to land upstream before we can use libbpf's headers,
> -// for now use our copy unconditionally, since the data structures at this point
> -// are exactly the same, no problem.
> -//#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> -//#include <bpf/hashmap.h>
> -//#else
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> +#include <bpf/hashmap.h>
> +#else
>  #include "util/hashmap.h"
> -//#endif
> +#endif
>  
>  struct metric_ref;
>  
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> index 0882b4754fcf..ce5e9e372fc4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@
>  #include "evlist.h"
>  #include "evsel.h"
>  #include "thread_map.h"
> -#include "hashmap.h"
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> +#include <bpf/hashmap.h>
> +#else
> +#include "util/hashmap.h"
> +#endif
>  #include <linux/zalloc.h>
>  
>  void update_stats(struct stats *stats, u64 val)
> -- 
> 2.37.2.609.g9ff673ca1a-goog

-- 

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ