[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a46dffe36f2570ec91761b1d604ac52fa0a10efb.1661348961.git.mqaio@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:01:04 +0800
From: Qiao Ma <mqaio@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: andrii@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, mykolal@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix incorrect fcntl call
To set socket noblock, we need to use
> fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
rather than:
> fcntl(fd, O_NONBLOCK);
Signed-off-by: Qiao Ma <mqaio@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index 0fbaccdc8861..b163b7cfd957 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
struct timeval timeout;
fd_set w;
- fcntl(fd, fd_flags);
+ fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, fd_flags);
/* Account for pop bytes noting each iteration of apply will
* call msg_pop_data helper so we need to account for this
* by calculating the number of apply iterations. Note user
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists