[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWZaN94M1OS2xRYo6M012mi-cRP_boeBi=p6VPnhbOS7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:04:53 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Weiguo Li <liwg06@...mail.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Dario Petrillo <dario.pk1@...il.com>,
Hewenliang <hewenliang4@...wei.com>,
yaowenbin <yaowenbin1@...wei.com>,
Wenyu Liu <liuwenyu7@...wei.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Pavithra Gurushankar <gpavithrasha@...il.com>,
Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@....com>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>,
Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...el.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Zechuan Chen <chenzechuan1@...wei.com>,
Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Remi Bernon <rbernon@...eweavers.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/18] perf record: Update use of pthread mutex
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:15 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 24/08/22 01:09, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Switch to the use of mutex wrappers that provide better error checking
> > for synth_lock.
>
> It would be better to distinguish patches that make drop-in
> replacements from patches like this that change logic.
The only change here is PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER to mutex_init
because PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER doesn't have error checking. The two
are morally equivalent and so no logic change is intended - although
one may inadvertently happen by the moving initialization from compile
time to runtime.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index 4713f0f3a6cf..02eb85677e99 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include "util/evsel.h"
> > #include "util/debug.h"
> > #include "util/mmap.h"
> > +#include "util/mutex.h"
> > #include "util/target.h"
> > #include "util/session.h"
> > #include "util/tool.h"
> > @@ -608,17 +609,18 @@ static int process_synthesized_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > return record__write(rec, NULL, event, event->header.size);
> > }
> >
> > +static struct mutex synth_lock;
> > +
> > static int process_locked_synthesized_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > union perf_event *event,
> > struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused,
> > struct machine *machine __maybe_unused)
> > {
> > - static pthread_mutex_t synth_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - pthread_mutex_lock(&synth_lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&synth_lock);
> > ret = process_synthesized_event(tool, event, sample, machine);
> > - pthread_mutex_unlock(&synth_lock);
> > + mutex_unlock(&synth_lock);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1917,6 +1919,7 @@ static int record__synthesize(struct record *rec, bool tail)
> > }
> >
> > if (rec->opts.nr_threads_synthesize > 1) {
> > + mutex_init(&synth_lock, /*pshared=*/false);
>
> It would be better to have mutex_init() and mutex_init_shared()
> since /*pshared=*/true is rarely used.
Will change in v3.
Thanks,
Ian
> > perf_set_multithreaded();
> > f = process_locked_synthesized_event;
> > }
> > @@ -1930,8 +1933,10 @@ static int record__synthesize(struct record *rec, bool tail)
> > rec->opts.nr_threads_synthesize);
> > }
> >
> > - if (rec->opts.nr_threads_synthesize > 1)
> > + if (rec->opts.nr_threads_synthesize > 1) {
> > perf_set_singlethreaded();
> > + mutex_destroy(&synth_lock);
> > + }
> >
> > out:
> > return err;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists