linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] dma-buf: Move dma-buf attachment to dynamic locking specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b24017e9-e8e7-148e-951b-0f2a1dffdca7@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:14:08 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
        Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@...labora.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
        Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Hellström <thomas_os@...pmail.org>,
        Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        lima@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] dma-buf: Move dma-buf attachment to dynamic
 locking specification

Am 24.08.22 um 17:03 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
> On 8/24/22 17:08, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 24.08.22 um 12:22 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>>> Move dma-buf attachment API functions to the dynamic locking
>>> specification.
>>> The strict locking convention prevents deadlock situations for dma-buf
>>> importers and exporters.
>>>
>>> Previously, the "unlocked" versions of the attachment API functions
>>> weren't taking the reservation lock and this patch makes them to take
>>> the lock.
>> Didn't we concluded that we need to keep the attach and detach callbacks
>> without the lock and only move the map/unmap callbacks over?
>>
>> Otherwise it won't be possible for drivers to lock multiple buffers if
>> they have to shuffle things around for a specific attachment.
> We did conclude that. The attach/detach dma-buf ops are unlocked, but
> the map_dma_buf/unmap_dma_buf must be invoked under lock and
> dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked() maps dma-buf if either importer or
> exporter can't handle the dynamic mapping [1].

Ah! You are confusing me over and over again with that :)

Ok in this case that here is fine, I just need to re-read the patch.

Thanks,
Christian.

>
> [1]
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.0-rc2%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Fdma-buf%2Fdma-buf.c%23L869&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cdf23d89db8b84bf6d4c008da85e1dc6c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637969502441026991%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=d8kWKjDCFn%2B3KmK135Gcv6%2FMLffEYcipouqWxfc%2BKXM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Hence I re-arranged the dma_resv_lock() in
> dma_buf_dynamic_attach_unlocked() to move both pinning and mapping under
> the held lock.
>