| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YweXhnusRr5ACYYd@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:38:46 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
keescook@...omium.org,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, upstream@...ihalf.com,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
"Sripada, Radhakrishna" <radhakrishna.sripada@...el.com>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: fix null pointer dereference
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:37:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Apologies in advance if you see this twice. I did not see the original
> >> make it to either lore.kernel.org or the freedesktop.org archives so I
> >> figured it might have been sent into the void.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 04:33:54PM +0100, Lukasz Bartosik wrote:
> >> > From: Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>
> >> >
> >> > Asus chromebook CX550 crashes during boot on v5.17-rc1 kernel.
> >> > The root cause is null pointer defeference of bi_next
> >> > in tgl_get_bw_info() in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c.
> >> >
> >> > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000002e
> >> > PGD 0 P4D 0
> >> > Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> >> > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G U 5.17.0-rc1
> >> > Hardware name: Google Delbin/Delbin, BIOS Google_Delbin.13672.156.3 05/14/2021
> >> > RIP: 0010:tgl_get_bw_info+0x2de/0x510
> >> > ...
> >> > [ 2.554467] Call Trace:
> >> > [ 2.554467] <TASK>
> >> > [ 2.554467] intel_bw_init_hw+0x14a/0x434
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? _printk+0x59/0x73
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? _dev_err+0x77/0x91
> >> > [ 2.554467] i915_driver_hw_probe+0x329/0x33e
> >> > [ 2.554467] i915_driver_probe+0x4c8/0x638
> >> > [ 2.554467] i915_pci_probe+0xf8/0x14e
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x12/0x2c
> >> > [ 2.554467] pci_device_probe+0xaa/0x142
> >> > [ 2.554467] really_probe+0x13f/0x2f4
> >> > [ 2.554467] __driver_probe_device+0x9e/0xd3
> >> > [ 2.554467] driver_probe_device+0x24/0x7c
> >> > [ 2.554467] __driver_attach+0xba/0xcf
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? driver_attach+0x1f/0x1f
> >> > [ 2.554467] bus_for_each_dev+0x8c/0xc0
> >> > [ 2.554467] bus_add_driver+0x11b/0x1f7
> >> > [ 2.554467] driver_register+0x60/0xea
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? mipi_dsi_bus_init+0x16/0x16
> >> > [ 2.554467] i915_init+0x2c/0xb9
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? mipi_dsi_bus_init+0x16/0x16
> >> > [ 2.554467] do_one_initcall+0x12e/0x2b3
> >> > [ 2.554467] do_initcall_level+0xd6/0xf3
> >> > [ 2.554467] do_initcalls+0x4e/0x79
> >> > [ 2.554467] kernel_init_freeable+0xed/0x14d
> >> > [ 2.554467] ? rest_init+0xc1/0xc1
> >> > [ 2.554467] kernel_init+0x1a/0x120
> >> > [ 2.554467] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> >> > [ 2.554467] </TASK>
> >> > ...
> >> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: c64a9a7c05be ("drm/i915: Update memory bandwidth formulae")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> >> > index 2da4aacc956b..bd0ed68b7faa 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> >> > @@ -404,15 +404,17 @@ static int tgl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel
> >> > int clpchgroup;
> >> > int j;
> >> >
> >> > - if (i < num_groups - 1)
> >> > - bi_next = &dev_priv->max_bw[i + 1];
> >> > -
> >> > clpchgroup = (sa->deburst * qi.deinterleave / num_channels) << i;
> >> >
> >> > - if (i < num_groups - 1 && clpchgroup < clperchgroup)
> >> > - bi_next->num_planes = (ipqdepth - clpchgroup) / clpchgroup + 1;
> >> > - else
> >> > - bi_next->num_planes = 0;
> >> > + if (i < num_groups - 1) {
> >> > + bi_next = &dev_priv->max_bw[i + 1];
> >> > +
> >> > + if (clpchgroup < clperchgroup)
> >> > + bi_next->num_planes = (ipqdepth - clpchgroup) /
> >> > + clpchgroup + 1;
> >> > + else
> >> > + bi_next->num_planes = 0;
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > bi->num_qgv_points = qi.num_points;
> >> > bi->num_psf_gv_points = qi.num_psf_points;
> >> > --
> >> > 2.35.0.rc2.247.g8bbb082509-goog
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Was this patch ever applied or was the issue fixed in a different way?
> >> If CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO is enabled (it is on by default when the
> >> compiler supports it), bi_next will be deterministically initialized to
> >> NULL, which means 'bi_next->num_planes = 0' will crash when the first if
> >> statement is not taken (i.e. 'i > num_groups - 1'). This was reported to
> >> us at [1] so it impacts real users (and I have been applying this change
> >> locally for six months). I see some discussion in this thread, was it
> >> ever resolved?
> >>
> >> [1]: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1626
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Nathan
> >
> > The patch was not accepted by upstream. I gave up after sending two reminders
> > that the issue is still present which resulted in no upstream reaction.
> > I have been also applying that patch locally for a few months.
> > Thanks for bringing it up to upstream attention again.
>
> Apologies for us dropping the ball here. There were objections to the
> code from Ville [1] but nobody stepped up to clean it up. I think this
> was really more about the commit being fixed c64a9a7c05be ("drm/i915:
> Update memory bandwidth formulae") than about the patch at hand.
>
> In any case, I've gone ahead and pushed this patch to drm-intel-next
> now. With the Fixes tag it should eventually find its way to stable
> v5.17+. Thank you for the patch, review - and nagging. ;)
>
> What still remains is cleaning up the code. But that should never have
> stalled the fix for months. Sorry again.
No worries, better late than never :) Thanks for applying the change!
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists