lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f009312f-0cb8-daed-aa2b-21e8c07da4c3@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 18:44:11 +0200
From:   Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/string_helpers: Introduce strsplit_u32()

On 2022-08-25 5:09 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
>> On 2022-08-09 5:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> Suggested-by would be enough.
> 
>> By the way, I've provided 'the final form' on thesofproject/linux as PR [1]
>> to see if no regression is caused in basic scenarios.
> 
> When you will be ready, send it for upstream review. It would be easier for
> the kernel community to look at and comment on.

On its way. Was awaiting your replay so I do not need to send the series 
twice : ) The PR was there to check if there is no regression on SOF 
side, at least on a BAT (Basic Acceptable Tests) level.


Regards,
Czarek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ