[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chYaeHvEkq2zCKeA6FiO0wfC2LCGc-1Sj=KdS8oU-2iFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 09:57:42 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add bpf_read_raw_record() helper
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:32 PM John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Ok, now I think that I can use a bpf-output sw event. It would need
> > another BPF program to write data to the event and the test program
> > can read it from BPF using this helper. :)
>
> Ah good idea. Feel free to carry my ACK to the v2 with the test.
Hmm.. it seems not to work because
1. bpf_output sw event doesn't have the overflow mechanism and it
doesn't call the bpf program.
2. even if I added it, it couldn't run due to the recursion protection by
bpf_prog_active.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists