linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 10/11] btrfs: tree-checker: check for overlapping extent items

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220825013836.23205-10-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:38:31 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, clm@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 10/11] btrfs: tree-checker: check for overlapping extent items

From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>

[ Upstream commit 899b7f69f244e539ea5df1b4d756046337de44a5 ]

We're seeing a weird problem in production where we have overlapping
extent items in the extent tree.  It's unclear where these are coming
from, and in debugging we realized there's no check in the tree checker
for this sort of problem.  Add a check to the tree-checker to make sure
that the extents do not overlap each other.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 32f1b15b25dc..1aadf9a43ef3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -1189,7 +1189,8 @@ static void extent_err(const struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
 }
 
 static int check_extent_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
-			     struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
+			     struct btrfs_key *key, int slot,
+			     struct btrfs_key *prev_key)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = leaf->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_extent_item *ei;
@@ -1400,6 +1401,26 @@ static int check_extent_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 			   total_refs, inline_refs);
 		return -EUCLEAN;
 	}
+
+	if ((prev_key->type == BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY) ||
+	    (prev_key->type == BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY)) {
+		u64 prev_end = prev_key->objectid;
+
+		if (prev_key->type == BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY)
+			prev_end += fs_info->nodesize;
+		else
+			prev_end += prev_key->offset;
+
+		if (unlikely(prev_end > key->objectid)) {
+			extent_err(leaf, slot,
+	"previous extent [%llu %u %llu] overlaps current extent [%llu %u %llu]",
+				   prev_key->objectid, prev_key->type,
+				   prev_key->offset, key->objectid, key->type,
+				   key->offset);
+			return -EUCLEAN;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1568,7 +1589,7 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY:
 	case BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY:
-		ret = check_extent_item(leaf, key, slot);
+		ret = check_extent_item(leaf, key, slot, prev_key);
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY:
 	case BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY:
-- 
2.35.1