[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKdEkA+SGRd+P=WJnZE1YUuMjyPz5JwKz6cttuJ5hA_SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:43:42 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] perf: Add perf_event_attr::config3
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 2:31 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 01:08:01PM -0500, Rob Herring escreveu:
> > Arm SPEv1.2 adds another 64-bits of event filtering control. As the
> > existing perf_event_attr::configN fields are all used up for SPE PMU, an
> > additional field is needed. Add a new 'config3' field.
>
> Try not to have tools/ and kernel code in the same patch, else you'll
> burden kernel developers into testing tools/, which so far has been
> refrained.
I knew that, but assumed the header was special...
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists