lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeP_ZLYSty2x_m27M_1HzsXx_DX=UsZopPEonAfr7_RyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:11:55 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Ramona Bolboaca <ramona.bolboaca@...log.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: add max11205 adc driver

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:56 PM Ramona Bolboaca
<ramona.bolboaca@...log.com> wrote:
>
> Adding support for max11205 16-bit single-channel ultra-low power
> delta-sigma adc.
> The MAX11205 is compatible with the 2-wire interface and uses
> SCLK and RDY/DOUT for serial communica- tions. In this mode, all
> controls are implemented by tim- ing the high or low phase of the SCLK.
> The 2-wire serial interface only allows for data to be read out through the
> RDY/DOUT output.

Is there any existing driver that can be extended to support this chip?

...

> +       st->chip_info = device_get_match_data(&spi->dev);

And if chip_info is NULL?

...

> +static void max11205_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +       struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> +       struct max11205_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);

> +       iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> +       regulator_disable(st->vref);
> +}

Have you tested module removal?

> +

...

> +static const struct chip_info max11205_chip_info[] = {
> +       [TYPE_MAX11205A] = {
> +               .out_data_rate = MAX11205A_OUT_DATA_RATE,

> +               .name = "max11205a"

+ Comma

> +       },
> +       [TYPE_MAX11205B] = {
> +               .out_data_rate = MAX11205B_OUT_DATA_RATE,

> +               .name = "max11205b"

Ditto.

> +       }

Ditto.

> +};

...

> +

Redundant blank line.

> +module_spi_driver(max11205_spi_driver);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ