lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220825202446.GC2538772@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:24:46 -0700
From:   Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To:     Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 009/103] KVM: TDX: Initialize the TDX module when
 loading the KVM intel kernel module

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:18:01PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> 
> On 2022/8/8 6:00, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> > 
> > TDX requires several initialization steps for KVM to create guest TDs.
> > Detect CPU feature, enable VMX (TDX is based on VMX), detect the TDX module
> > availability, and initialize it.  This patch implements those steps.
> > 
> > There are several options on when to initialize the TDX module.  A.) kernel
> > module loading time, B.) the first guest TD creation time.  A.) was chosen.
> > With B.), a user may hit an error of the TDX initialization when trying to
> > create the first guest TD.  The machine that fails to initialize the TDX
> > module can't boot any guest TD further.  Such failure is undesirable and a
> > surprise because the user expects that the machine can accommodate guest
> > TD, but actually not.  So A.) is better than B.).
> > 
> > Introduce a module parameter, enable_tdx, to explicitly enable TDX KVM
> > support.  It's off by default to keep same behavior for those who don't use
> > TDX.  Implement hardware_setup method to detect TDX feature of CPU.
> > Because TDX requires all present CPUs to enable VMX (VMXON).  The x86
> > specific kvm_arch_post_hardware_enable_setup overrides the existing weak
> > symbol of kvm_arch_post_hardware_enable_setup which is called at the KVM
> > module initialization.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
> >   arch/x86/kvm/Makefile           |  1 +
> >   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c         | 29 ++++++++++-
> >   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c          | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h          |  4 ++
> >   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h      |  6 +++
> >   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  8 +++
> >   arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c     |  1 +
> >   8 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >   create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 3d000f060077..f432ad32515c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -1659,6 +1659,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_init_ops {
> >   	int (*cpu_has_kvm_support)(void);
> >   	int (*disabled_by_bios)(void);
> >   	int (*hardware_setup)(void);
> > +	int (*post_hardware_enable_setup)(void);
> >   	unsigned int (*handle_intel_pt_intr)(void);
> >   	struct kvm_x86_ops *runtime_ops;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile b/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
> > index ee4d0999f20f..e2c05195cb95 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Makefile
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_XEN)	+= xen.o
> >   kvm-intel-y		+= vmx/vmx.o vmx/vmenter.o vmx/pmu_intel.o vmx/vmcs12.o \
> >   			   vmx/evmcs.o vmx/nested.o vmx/posted_intr.o vmx/main.o
> >   kvm-intel-$(CONFIG_X86_SGX_KVM)	+= vmx/sgx.o
> > +kvm-intel-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST)	+= vmx/tdx.o
> >   kvm-amd-y		+= svm/svm.o svm/vmenter.o svm/pmu.o svm/nested.o svm/avic.o svm/sev.o
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > index a0252cc0b48d..ac788af17d92 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,32 @@
> >   #include "pmu.h"
> >   #include "tdx.h"
> > +static bool __read_mostly enable_tdx = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST);
> 
> So, if CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST is opt-in in kconfig, the code will try to
> enable TDX.
> 
> The behavior seems a bit different from what you mentioned in the commit
> message about the option to "explicitly enable TDX KVM
> support".

Oops.  For least surpise, I'll fix it as follows.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
index ac788af17d92..973c437f1a4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 #include "pmu.h"
 #include "tdx.h"
 
-static bool __read_mostly enable_tdx = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST);
+static bool __read_mostly enable_tdx;
 module_param_named(tdx, enable_tdx, bool, 0444);
 
 static __init int vt_hardware_setup(void)

-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ