[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL715W+y6kRvLUOpY+u91mdY1XdfaJsgzJuwozrZW3=UqSp2nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:37:57 -0700
From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: Get vmcs12 pages before checking pending interrupts
> Currently, KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE is a two-step process in which the 1st
> step does not require vmcs12 to be ready. So, I am thinking about what
> it means to deprecate KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES?
typo:
"KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE is a two-step process" -> "Launching a nested VM
is a two-step process".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists