Message-ID: <6307031b763be_18ed729455@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:05:31 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口　直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
CC:     Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "djwong@...nel.org" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        "david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
        "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "jane.chu@...cle.com" <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
        "rgoldwyn@...e.de" <rgoldwyn@...e.de>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
        "linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case

Dan Williams wrote:
> HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口　直也) wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:52:51PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > > This new function is a variant of mf_generic_kill_procs that accepts a
> > > > file, offset pair instead of a struct to support multiple files sharing
> > > > a DAX mapping.  It is intended to be called by the file systems as part
> > > > of the memory_failure handler after the file system performed a reverse
> > > > mapping from the storage address to the file and file offset.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/linux/mm.h  |  2 +
> > > >  mm/memory-failure.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > >  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately my test suite was only running the "non-destructive" set
> > > of 'ndctl' tests which skipped some of the complex memory-failure cases.
> > > Upon fixing that, bisect flags this commit as the source of the following
> > > crash regression:
> > 
> > Thank you for testing/reporting.
> > 
> > > 
> > >  kernel BUG at mm/memory-failure.c:310!
> > >  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> > >  CPU: 26 PID: 1252 Comm: dax-pmd Tainted: G           OE     5.19.0-rc4+ #58
> > >  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> > >  RIP: 0010:add_to_kill+0x304/0x400
> > > [..]
> > >  Call Trace:
> > >   <TASK>
> > >   collect_procs.part.0+0x2c8/0x470
> > >   memory_failure+0x979/0xf30
> > >   do_madvise.part.0.cold+0x9c/0xd3
> > >   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe3/0x140
> > >   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
> > >   ? lock_release+0x145/0x2f0
> > >   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe3/0x140
> > >   ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70
> > >   __x64_sys_madvise+0x56/0x70
> > >   do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
> > >   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> > 
> > This stacktrace shows that VM_BUG_ON_VMA() in dev_pagemap_mapping_shift()
> > was triggered.  I think that BUG_ON is too harsh here because address ==
> > -EFAULT means that there's no mapping for the address.  The subsequent
> > code considers "tk->size_shift == 0" as "no mapping" cases, so
> > dev_pagemap_mapping_shift() can return 0 in such a case?
> > 
> > Could the following diff work for the issue?
> 
> This passes the "dax-ext4.sh" and "dax-xfs.sh" tests from the ndctl
> suite.
> 
> It then fails on the "device-dax" test with this signature:
> 
>  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010
>  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>  PGD 8000000205073067 P4D 8000000205073067 PUD 2062b3067 PMD 0 
>  Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
>  CPU: 22 PID: 4535 Comm: device-dax Tainted: G           OE    N 6.0.0-rc2+ #59
>  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>  RIP: 0010:memory_failure+0x667/0xba0
> [..]
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   ? _printk+0x58/0x73
>   do_madvise.part.0.cold+0xaf/0xc5
> 
> Which is:
> 
> (gdb) li *(memory_failure+0x667)
> 0xffffffff813b7f17 is in memory_failure (mm/memory-failure.c:1933).
> 1928
> 1929            /*
> 1930             * Call driver's implementation to handle the memory failure, otherwise
> 1931             * fall back to generic handler.
> 1932             */
> 1933            if (pgmap->ops->memory_failure) {
> 1934                    rc = pgmap->ops->memory_failure(pgmap, pfn, 1, flags);
> 
> 
> ...I think this is just a simple matter of:
> 
> @@ -1928,7 +1930,7 @@ static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
>          * Call driver's implementation to handle the memory failure, otherwise
>          * fall back to generic handler.
>          */
> -       if (pgmap->ops->memory_failure) {
> +       if (pgmap->ops && pgmap->ops->memory_failure) {
>                 rc = pgmap->ops->memory_failure(pgmap, pfn, 1, flags);
>                 /*
>                  * Fall back to generic handler too if operation is not
> 
> 
> ...since device-dax does not implement pagemap ops.
> 
> I will see what else pops up and make sure that this regression always
> runs going forward.

Ok, that was last of the regression fallout that I could find.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists