[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbf2164c-332d-9787-31d0-3c5f8ff53d93@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:42:42 +0000
From: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To: <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <jgross@...e.com>,
<sstabellini@...nel.org>, <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: Fix double word in comments
On 25.08.2022 04:49, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from dengshaomin@...rlc.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Delete the rebundant word "the" in comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 2 +-
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index d91a010e65f5..f1234e719e58 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -1748,7 +1748,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> writel_relaxed(~0, at91_gpio->regbase + PIO_IDR);
>
> /*
> - * Let the generic code handle this edge IRQ, the the chained
> + * Let the generic code handle this edge IRQ, the chained
> * handler will perform the actual work of handling the parent
> * interrupt.
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c
> index e38b43b5065e..52da75bf8485 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ int xen_pcibk_enable_msi(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
> }
>
> /* The value the guest needs is actually the IDT vector, not the
> - * local domain's IRQ number. */
> + * local domain's IRQ number.
> + */
This should go in a different patch.
>
> op->value = dev->irq ? xen_pirq_from_irq(dev->irq) : 0;
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists