lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:59:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     duoming@....edu.cn
Cc:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        amit karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
        Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>, kvalo@...nel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] Add new APIs of devcoredump and fix bugs

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:44:55AM +0800, duoming@....edu.cn wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 13:42:09 -0700 Brian Norris wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 4:21 AM Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn> wrote:
> > >
> > > The first patch adds new APIs to support migration of users
> > > from old device coredump related APIs.
> > >
> > > The second patch fix sleep in atomic context bugs of mwifiex
> > > caused by dev_coredumpv().
> > >
> > > Duoming Zhou (2):
> > >   devcoredump: add new APIs to support migration of users from old
> > >     device coredump related APIs
> > >   mwifiex: fix sleep in atomic context bugs caused by dev_coredumpv
> > 
> > I would have expected a third patch in here, that actually converts
> > existing users. Then in the following release cycle, clean up any new
> > users of the old API that pop up in the meantime and drop the old API.
> > 
> > But I'll defer to the people who would actually be merging your code.
> > Technically it could also work to simply provide the API this cycle,
> > and convert everyone in the next.
> 
> Thank your for your time and reply.
> 
> If this patch set is merged into the linux-next tree, I will send the 
> third patch which targets at linux-next tree and converts existing users 
> at later timer of this release cycle. Because there are new users that 
> may use the old APIs comes into linux-next tree during the remaining time
> of this release cycle.

No, that's not how this works, we can't add patches with new functions
that no one uses.  And it's not how I asked for this api to be migrated
over time properly.  I'll try to respond to your patch with more details
in a week or so when I catch up on patch review...

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ