linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4A0F7B38-2701-486D-A847-DCC4B49F8EAF@linux.dev>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:30:48 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64



> On Aug 25, 2022, at 08:05, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> For several years, MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH was kept at 32 but with bigger
> machines and the network intensive workloads requiring througput in
> Gbps, 32 is too small and makes the memcg charging path a bottleneck.
> For now, increase it to 64 for easy acceptance to 6.0. We will need to
> revisit this in future for ever increasing demand of higher performance.
> 
> Please note that the memcg charge path drain the per-cpu memcg charge
> stock, so there should not be any oom behavior change. Though it does
> have impact on rstat flushing and high limit reclaim backoff.
> 
> To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we
> ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy.
> 
> $ netserver -6
> # 36 instances of netperf with following params
> $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K
> 
> Results (average throughput of netperf):
> Without (6.0-rc1)       10482.7 Mbps
> With patch              17064.7 Mbps (62.7% improvement)
> 
> With the patch, the throughput improved by 62.7%.

This is very impressive.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>

Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>

Thanks.