[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwbQtaaCkBwezpB+@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 04:30:29 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Roth, Michael" <Michael.Roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@...gle.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 02/49] iommu/amd: Introduce function to check
SEV-SNP support
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 04:28:12AM +0300, jarkko@...nel.org wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:50:59AM -0600, Peter Gonda wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:45 AM Kalra, Ashish <Ashish.Kalra@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> > >
> > > Hello Peter,
> > >
> > > >> +bool iommu_sev_snp_supported(void)
> > > >> +{
> > > >> + struct amd_iommu *iommu;
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /*
> > > >> + * The SEV-SNP support requires that IOMMU must be enabled, and is
> > > >> + * not configured in the passthrough mode.
> > > >> + */
> > > >> + if (no_iommu || iommu_default_passthrough()) {
> > > >> + pr_err("SEV-SNP: IOMMU is either disabled or
> > > >> + configured in passthrough mode.\n");
> > >
> > > > Like below could this say something like snp support is disabled because of iommu settings.
> > >
> > > Here we may need to be more precise with the error information indicating why SNP is not enabled.
> > > Please note that this patch may actually become part of the IOMMU + SNP patch series, where
> > > additional checks are done, for example, not enabling SNP if IOMMU v2 page tables are enabled,
> > > so precise error information will be useful here.
> >
> > I agree we should be more precise. I just thought we should explicitly
> > state something like: "SEV-SNP: IOMMU is either disabled or configured
> > in passthrough mode, SNP cannot be supported".
>
> It really should be, in order to have any practical use:
>
> if (no_iommu) {
> pr_err("SEV-SNP: IOMMU is disabled.\n");
> return false;
> }
>
> if (iommu_default_passthrough()) {
> pr_err("SEV-SNP: IOMMU is configured in passthrough mode.\n");
> return false;
> }
>
> The comment is *completely* redundant, it absolutely does
> not serve any sane purpose. It just tells what the code
> already clearly stating.
>
> The combo error message on the other hand leaves you to
> the question "which one was it", and for that reason
> combining the checks leaves you to a louse debugging
> experience.
Also, are those really *errors*? That implies that there
is something wrong.
Since you can have a legit configuration, IMHO they should
be either warn or info. What do you think?
They are definitely not errors.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists