[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b8fbdb220d1806e622c56e65bd283a5c3212fab.camel@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:19:14 +0200
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com,
corbet@....net, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
deso@...teo.net, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/10] bpf: Add kfuncs for PKCS#7 signature
verification
On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 17:00 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
> One of the desirable features in security is the ability to restrict
> import
> of data to a given system based on data authenticity. If data import
> can be
> restricted, it would be possible to enforce a system-wide policy
> based on
> the signing keys the system owner trusts.
Hi
is there anything else I need to do, other than rebasing the patches to
the latest eBPF code?
Thanks
Roberto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists