[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58570869-aab7-027b-36ff-0ad0a7b7c0b1@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:38:00 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/mtrr: remove unused cyrix_set_all() function
On 25.08.22 12:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:25:25AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> The Cyrix cpu specific MTRR function cyrix_set_all() will never be
>> called, as the struct mtrr_ops set_all() callback will only be called
>> in the use_intel() case, which would require the use_intel_if member
>> of struct mtrr_ops to be set, which isn't the case for Cyrix.
>
> Doing some git archeology:
>
> So the commit which added mtrr_aps_delayed_init is
>
> d0af9eed5aa9 ("x86, pat/mtrr: Rendezvous all the cpus for MTRR/PAT init")
>
> from 2009.
>
> The IPI callback before it, looked like this:
>
> static void ipi_handler(void *info)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> struct set_mtrr_data *data = info;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> atomic_dec(&data->count);
> while (!atomic_read(&data->gate))
> cpu_relax();
>
> /* The master has cleared me to execute */
> if (data->smp_reg != ~0U) {
> mtrr_if->set(data->smp_reg, data->smp_base,
> data->smp_size, data->smp_type);
> } else {
> mtrr_if->set_all();
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> and that else branch would call ->set_all() on Cyrix too.
>
> Suresh's patch changed it to do:
>
> - } else {
> + } else if (mtrr_aps_delayed_init) {
> + /*
> + * Initialize the MTRRs inaddition to the synchronisation.
> + */
> mtrr_if->set_all();
>
> BUT below in the set_mtrr() call, it did:
>
> /*
> * HACK!
> * We use this same function to initialize the mtrrs on boot.
> * The state of the boot cpu's mtrrs has been saved, and we want
> * to replicate across all the APs.
> * If we're doing that @reg is set to something special...
> */
> if (reg != ~0U)
> mtrr_if->set(reg, base, size, type);
> else if (!mtrr_aps_delayed_init)
> mtrr_if->set_all();
> ^^^
>
> and that would be the Cyrix case.
>
> But then
>
> 192d8857427d ("x86, mtrr: use stop_machine APIs for doing MTRR rendezvous")
>
> came and "cleaned" all up by removing the "HACK" and doing ->set_all()
> only in the rendezvous handler:
>
> + } else if (mtrr_aps_delayed_init || !cpu_online(smp_processor_id())) {
> mtrr_if->set_all();
> }
>
> Which begs the question: why doesn't the second part of the else test
> match on Cyrix? The "|| !cpu_online(smp_processor_id())" case.
>
> If only we had a Cyrix machine somewhere...
>
You are missing one aspect here: there is no call path for Cyrix CPUs using
reg == ~0U.
So the condition of the "else if" will never be evaluated with Cyrix.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists