[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ba586d6-bc1b-05b6-1018-d8f774e2c952@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:56:32 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com, nancy.lin@...iatek.com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, hsinyi@...gle.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: change compatible for
MT8195
On 25/08/2022 07:56, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
>
> For previous MediaTek SoCs, such as MT8173, there are 2 display HW
> pipelines binding to 1 mmsys with the same power domain, the same
> clock driver and the same mediatek-drm driver.
>
> For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding to
> 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different
> mediatek-drm drivers.
>
> Therefore, we need to separate these two different mmsys hardwares to
> 2 different compatibles for MT8195.
>
> Fixes: 81c5a41d10b9 ("dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding")
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
> index 6ad023eec193..bfbdd30d2092 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ properties:
> - mediatek,mt8183-mmsys
> - mediatek,mt8186-mmsys
> - mediatek,mt8192-mmsys
> - - mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
> + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
> + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
If I understand correctly support for vdosys0 is merged with the old compatible.
We should therefore keep mediatek,mt8195-mmsys as a fallback for
mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0.
Regards,
Matthias
> - mediatek,mt8365-mmsys
> - const: syscon
> - items:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists