[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbFkV1T+K9wKDyODkcwu=nhbV+4_JF=YTaA5ad_w4ggbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:43:13 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: fix CPU_V6 dependencies
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 4:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL must not be combined with CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP
> because the patching of read-only data does not work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
The $SUBJECT of this patch is mildly confusing, as the affected
targets are maybe CPU_V6 but the change is related to XIP and
SMP_ON_UP.
Other than that it looks good.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists