lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ywa/BaYIdBi7N0iR@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:15:01 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests: KVM: Introduce vcpu_run_interruptable()

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> Introduce vcpu_run_interruptable() to allow selftests execute their own
> code when a vcpu is kicked out of KVM_RUN on receiving a POSIX signal.

But that's what __vcpu_run() is for.  Clearing "immediate_exit" after KVM_RUN does
not scream "interruptible" to me.

There's only one user after this series, just clear vcpu->run->immediate_exit
manually in that test (a comment on _why_ it's cleared would be helpful).

> +int vcpu_run_interruptable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	rc = __vcpu_run(vcpu);
> +
> +	vcpu->run->immediate_exit = 0;
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  int _vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	int rc;
> -- 
> 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ