[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ywa/BaYIdBi7N0iR@google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:15:01 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests: KVM: Introduce vcpu_run_interruptable()
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> Introduce vcpu_run_interruptable() to allow selftests execute their own
> code when a vcpu is kicked out of KVM_RUN on receiving a POSIX signal.
But that's what __vcpu_run() is for. Clearing "immediate_exit" after KVM_RUN does
not scream "interruptible" to me.
There's only one user after this series, just clear vcpu->run->immediate_exit
manually in that test (a comment on _why_ it's cleared would be helpful).
> +int vcpu_run_interruptable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = __vcpu_run(vcpu);
> +
> + vcpu->run->immediate_exit = 0;
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> int _vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int rc;
> --
> 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists