linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/25] usb: gadget: f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220826190139.yyc5rjxysfzhtvj5@synopsys.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:01:44 +0000
From:   Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC:     Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov@...ro.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/25] usb: gadget: f_tcm: Update state on data write

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-07-18 18:27:45 [-0700], Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > When preparing request for data write state, the next state is
> > UASP_SEND_STATUS. When data write completes, the next state is
> > UASP_QUEUE_COMMAND. Without this change, the command will transition to
> > the wrong state.
> 
> Why is this needed now, what is the outcome of not having it?
> My point is, was this always broken, worked by chance and broke over
> time while code was changed?

This patch should've been part of the patch "usb: gadget: f_tcm: Execute
command on write completion", and maybe I should've been more clear in
the commmit message.

Previously, the f_tcm doesn't take care of the case where the queued
data could fail/aborted. It attempts to execute the command anyway.

This change here takes care of both scenarios. If the request fails, the
next state is to send status, and if the request completes successfully,
the next state is to queue a new command.

Thanks,
Thinh


> 
> > Signed-off-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
> > ---
> >  Changes in v2:
> >  - Move a related change from TASK MANAGEMENT updating cmd state to
> >    UASP_QUEUE_COMMAND to here.
> > 
> >  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c
> > index 1e7d29f8aecb..d7318c84af98 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c
> > @@ -934,6 +934,8 @@ static void usbg_data_write_cmpl(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *req)
> >  	struct usbg_cmd *cmd = req->context;
> >  	struct se_cmd *se_cmd = &cmd->se_cmd;
> >  
> > +	cmd->state = UASP_QUEUE_COMMAND;
> > +
> >  	if (req->status < 0) {
> >  		pr_err("%s() state %d transfer failed\n", __func__, cmd->state);
> >  		goto cleanup;
> > @@ -976,6 +978,8 @@ static int usbg_prepare_w_request(struct usbg_cmd *cmd, struct usb_request *req)
> >  	req->complete = usbg_data_write_cmpl;
> >  	req->length = se_cmd->data_length;
> >  	req->context = cmd;
> > +
> > +	cmd->state = UASP_SEND_STATUS;
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Sebastian