| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:27:09 +0200
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Amarula patchwork <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, Dario Binacchi <dariobin@...ero.it>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: net: can: add STM32 bxcan DT bindings
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:12 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 10:29:33AM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > Add documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 basic extended
> > CAN (bxcan) controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@...ero.it>
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Change the file name into 'st,stm32-bxcan-core.yaml'.
> > - Rename compatibles:
> > - st,stm32-bxcan-core -> st,stm32f4-bxcan-core
> > - st,stm32-bxcan -> st,stm32f4-bxcan
> > - Rename master property to st,can-master.
> > - Remove the status property from the example.
> > - Put the node child properties as required.
> >
> > .../bindings/net/can/st,stm32-bxcan.yaml | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,stm32-bxcan.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,stm32-bxcan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,stm32-bxcan.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..288631b5556d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/st,stm32-bxcan.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/can/st,stm32-bxcan.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: STMicroelectronics bxCAN controller
> > +
> > +description: STMicroelectronics BxCAN controller for CAN bus
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: can-controller.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - st,stm32f4-bxcan-core
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + resets:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + description:
> > + Input clock for registers access
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + '#address-cells':
> > + const: 1
> > +
> > + '#size-cells':
> > + const: 0
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - resets
> > + - clocks
> > + - '#address-cells'
> > + - '#size-cells'
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^can@[0-9]+$":
> > + type: object
> > + description:
> > + A CAN block node contains two subnodes, representing each one a CAN
> > + instance available on the machine.
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - st,stm32f4-bxcan
> > +
> > + st,can-master:
> > + description:
> > + Master and slave mode of the bxCAN peripheral is only relevant
> > + if the chip has two CAN peripherals. In that case they share
> > + some of the required logic, and that means you cannot use the
> > + slave CAN without the master CAN.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + description: |
> > + Offset of CAN instance in CAN block. Valid values are:
> > + - 0x0: CAN1
> > + - 0x400: CAN2
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + interrupts:
> > + items:
> > + - description: transmit interrupt
> > + - description: FIFO 0 receive interrupt
> > + - description: FIFO 1 receive interrupt
> > + - description: status change error interrupt
> > +
> > + interrupt-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: tx
> > + - const: rx0
> > + - const: rx1
> > + - const: sce
> > +
> > + resets:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + description:
> > + Input clock for registers access
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - interrupts
> > + - resets
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/mfd/stm32f4-rcc.h>
> > +
> > + can: can@...06400 {
> > + compatible = "st,stm32f4-bxcan-core";
> > + reg = <0x40006400 0x800>;
> > + resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
> > + clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN1)>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
>
> Missing 'ranges'.
In the file arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi, I didn't find any other
node using the 'ranges' property, so
I didn't use it for the CAN node either.
>
> > + can1: can@0 {
> > + compatible = "st,stm32f4-bxcan";
> > + reg = <0x0>;
> > + interrupts = <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>;
> > + interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
> > + resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN1)>;
> > + st,can-master;
>
> No clocks?
It uses the parent node clock, since it is in master mode.
Thanks and regards,
Dario
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + can2: can@400 {
> > + compatible = "st,stm32f4-bxcan";
> > + reg = <0x400>;
> > + interrupts = <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>;
> > + interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce";
> > + resets = <&rcc STM32F4_APB1_RESET(CAN2)>;
> > + clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F4_APB1_CLOCK(CAN2)>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
> >
--
Dario Binacchi
Embedded Linux Developer
dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@...rulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists