lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYZOK9NhEqqU4Wkg1XHCHEQk=AR6w9730qo_tHmgGrorA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:01:40 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
        Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:26 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
(...)
> Caused by commit
>
>   e6cbbe42944d ("pinctrl: Add Cypress cy8c95x0 support")
>
> interacting with commit
>
>   ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void")
>
> from the i2c tree.

How typical, the ideal way to resolve it is if there is an immutable
branch with the
basic changes I can pull in from the i2c tree and apply Stephen's fix on top,
or we can just wait for the merge window and let Torvalds sort it out?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ