linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Document alternative for referring upstream commit hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwiEDsngUL//ogBL@eldamar.lan>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:27:58 +0200
From:   Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Document alternative for
 referring upstream commit hash

Hi Jonathan,

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 06:54:59AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> writes:
> 
> > Additionally to the "commit <sha1> upstream." variant, "[ Upstream
> > commit <sha1> ]" is used as well as alternative to refer to the upstream
> > commit hash.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> So this is a nit but...
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> > index c61865e91f52..2fd8aa593a28 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
> > @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ text, like this:
> >  
> >      commit <sha1> upstream.
> >  
> > +or alternatively:
> > +
> > +.. code-block:: none
> > +
> > +    [ Upstream commit <sha1> ]
> 
> Can this just be:
> 
>   or alternatively::
> 
>     [ Upstream commit <sha1> ]
> 
> That extra RST markup just clutters things without any advantage.

Btw, after revisiting, I think Greg actually can pick up the first
version of the patch. Changing the above without adding the
code-block:node will reformat the

     [ Upstream commit <sha1> ]

differently when rendering to html.

Greg, so as the patch has not yet been commited, can you pick up the
first version from
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220809045543.2049293-1-carnil@debian.org/
?

Regards,
Salvatore