linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Add start_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7927ac6e-7738-822a-59ce-09992947f3b4@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:57:24 +0200
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To:     shangxiaojing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sched/deadline: Add start_new_instance helper

On 8/26/22 09:40, shangxiaojing wrote:
>> again, this is not a good function name. Maybe, dl_replenish_new_period() ?
> 
> right, i have thought like replenish_new_instance, but when i'm making
> patch,  i was worried that "replenish" is only for ENQUEUE_REPLENISH.

I see, but that is a flag, not the action.

> what about dl_start_new_period? which means a new deadline will be set, rather than

The thing it is doing is replenishing... 

>     dl_se->deadline += pi_of(dl_se)->dl_period;
> 
> in replenish_dl_entity.

that is why I added "new_period"....  so replenish_dl_new_period() to keep the consistency.

>>> +static inline void start_new_instance(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq)
>>>
>>> +{
>>> +    /* for non-boosted task, pi_of(dl_se) == dl_se */
>>> +    dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + pi_of(dl_se)->dl_deadline;
>>> +    dl_se->runtime = pi_of(dl_se)->dl_runtime;
>>> +}
>>> +
>> -- Daniel 

-- Daniel