lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbKzoVoch+hRJtp=vaCQvKSt+=HMJYZ4WxWjFr+-tZ4KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:30:39 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, simon.guinot@...uanux.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Sheng-Yuan Huang <syhuang3@...oton.com>,
        Tasanakorn Phaipool <tasanakorn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] gpio-f7188x: Add GPIO support for Nuvoton NCT6116

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:18 PM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:

> > You did not write it, but you are using it to do hw-enablement for
> > your company's products. So being asked to also some touch-ups
> > left and right while you are at it really is not unexpected IMHO.
>
> Sure thing. Dropping a few characters from a line i touch anyhow is
> easy enough. But i.e a refactoring to pr_fmt would feel like asking too
> much in my book. That feels like work of the author or maintainer.
>
> In fact i am just doing the homework of what i think should have long
> been done by Nuvoton.

A lot of vendors don't have much active upstream participation, they
outsource that work to people like yourself by just ignoring it.

> I hope that v5 will be acceptable.

Bartosz is applying GPIO patches now, but my principle was that
when I feel a patch makes the kernel look better after than before the
patch and no new version is coming, I just apply the patch.
This is how we deal with "perfect is the enemy of good" in practice.
That said, we are all grateful for any improvements you manage to
sneak in!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ