linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: Allow user to customise maximum number of GPIOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYizQhiJXzXNHg7TXUVHzhkwXHFN5+e58kH4udGm1ziEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:49:49 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER FILES" 
        <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Allow user to customise maximum number of GPIOs

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 4:00 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:

> > Christophe? Will you take a stab at it?
>
> Which patch should I write ?

One that removes CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NR_GPIO entirely, then
allocate bases for new GPIO chips from 0 and upward instead.
And then see what happens.

Yours,
Linus Walleij