[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ywjc29EcrpbMObcd@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:46:51 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Müller <deso@...teo.net>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/10] btf: Handle dynamic pointer parameter in kfuncs
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 05:43:50PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:46:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:16:14PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:54 PM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
> > > > > - enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
> > > > > +bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
> > > > > + enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
> > > > > int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Might be niticking but generally I'd consider splitting
> > > > exports as commits of their own.
> > >
> > > -static bool
> > > +bool
> > >
> > > into a separate commit?
> > >
> > > I guess it makes sense for people whose salary depends on
> > > number of commits.
> > > We don't play these games.
> >
> > What kind of argument is that anyway.
>
> "Separate each *logical change* into a separate patch." [*]
>
> To add, generally any user space visible space should be an
~~~~~
change
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists