linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock tests: add NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:52:58 -0500
From:   Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock tests: add NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*

These patches add additional tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() that use a simulated physical
memory that is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, most of
these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE.

To set up a simulated physical memory with multiple NUMA nodes, patch 1
introduces setup_numa_memblock_generic() and setup_numa_memblock().
These functions use a previously allocated dummy physical memory. They
can be used in place of setup_memblock() in tests that need to simulate
a NUMA system.

These tests are run twice, once for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and once
for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), so that both functions are tested with
the same set of tests. When the tests run memblock_alloc_try_nid(), they
test that the entire memory region is zero. When the tests run
memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), they test that the entire memory region is
nonzero.

Note:
This patch set depends on the following patch set:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1661578349.git.remckee0@gmail.com/

---
Changelog

v2 -> v3
PATCH 2, PATCH 3, PATCH 4:
- tests/alloc_nid_api.c:
    + Edits for consistency between tests and test naming styles:
        * Change "numa_top_down" to "top_down_numa"
        * Change "numa_bottom_up" to "bottom_up_numa"
        * Move "generic" to immediately before "check"
        * alloc_try_nid_bottom_up_numa_small_node_check() and
          alloc_try_nid_bottom_up_numa_node_reserved_check():
            - Separate size definition from its declaration

Updates based on changes to the dependent patch set noted above:
PATCH 2, PATCH 3, PATCH 4:
- tests/alloc_nid_api.c:
    + get_func_testing():
        * Rename to get_memblock_alloc_try_nid_name().
    + Update calls to verify_mem_content() to assert_mem_content().

v1 -> v2
Updates based on changes to the dependent patch set noted above:
PATCH 2, PATCH 3, PATCH 4:
- tests/alloc_nid_api.c:
    + Update calls to verify_mem_content() to include the flags parameter
      required by the new, common verify_mem_content() function.
---

Rebecca Mckeever (4):
  memblock tests: add simulation of physical memory with multiple NUMA
    nodes
  memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*
  memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*
  memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*

 .../testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include |    2 +-
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c  | 1491 ++++++++++++++++-
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.h  |   16 +
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c         |   38 +
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h         |   27 +-
 5 files changed, 1561 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1