[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ywmfg2vP5tDWdzOY@ZenIV>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:37:23 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daire Byrne <daire@...g.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] NFSD: allow parallel creates from nfsd
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:10:43PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> if (is_create_with_attrs(open))
> nfsd4_acl_to_attr(NF4REG, open->op_acl, &attrs);
> + inode = d_inode(path.dentry);
>
> - inode_lock_nested(inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> + child = filename_create_one_len(open->op_fname,
> + open->op_fnamelen,
> + &path, 0, &wq);
>
> - child = lookup_one_len(open->op_fname, parent, open->op_fnamelen);
> - if (IS_ERR(child)) {
> - status = nfserrno(PTR_ERR(child));
> - goto out;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(child))
> + return nfserrno(PTR_ERR(child));
Leaks acls, by the look of it?
> + if (!IS_PAR_UPDATE(fhp->fh_dentry->d_inode) &&
> + inode_trylock_shared(fhp->fh_dentry->d_inode)) {
> + /* only have a shared lock */
> + inode_unlock_shared(fhp->fh_dentry->d_inode);
> + fhp->fh_no_atomic_attr = true;
> + fhp->fh_no_wcc = true;
Er... Shouldn't that be IS_PAR_UPDATE() && ... ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists