[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18e43d40-577d-2878-5673-706defd699d5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:55:55 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/17] iommu/vt-d: Add blocking domain support
On 2022/8/26 22:54, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:11:33PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The Intel IOMMU hardwares support blocking DMA transactions by clearing
>> the translation table entries. This implements a real blocking domain to
>> avoid using an empty UNMANAGED domain. The detach_dev callback of the
>> domain ops is not used in any path. Remove it to avoid dead code as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> At this point I'd suggest to make a little series that does all the
> blocking domain stuff in one shot
>
> The removal of detach_dev callbacks is pretty nice for clarity.
Yes. As you saw, I have a separated series for above purpose.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists