[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e158f8dc433b6b78d47d209495bed678d92369a.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 09:46:14 -0400
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pwm: sysfs: Utilize an array for polarity strings
On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 09:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sunday, August 28, 2022, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2022-08-26 at 20:07 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Code is smaller and looks nicer if we combine polarity strings
> > > into an array.
>
> First of all, please remove unnecessary context when replying.
I am _very_ aware of context.
I specifically left the code in.
> > It's less robust though as PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL and _INVERSED
> > are now required to be 0 and 1. As the only 2 values in
> > an enum they are, but that's not really guaranteed unless
> > you read the enum definition.
>
> So, what do you suggest here and in many other similar places (yes, ABI
> implied) in the kernel?
Leaving the code alone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists