lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 28 Aug 2022 18:17:43 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        lpieralisi@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Cc:     kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom-ep: Add support for SM8450
 SoC

On 26/08/2022 21:19, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings support for SM8450 SoC. Only the clocks are
> different on this platform, rest is same as SDX55.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-ep.yaml | 27 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-ep.yaml
> index 83a2cfc63bc1..9914d575ec41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-ep.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-ep.yaml
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ maintainers:
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      const: qcom,sdx55-pcie-ep
> +    const: qcom,sm8450-pcie-ep

You need to test the bindings with `make dt_binding_check`. This
requires an enum instead of two consts.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ