[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220828170652.12127638@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 17:06:52 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio/accel: fix repeated words in comments
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:00:23 +0800
wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com> wrote:
> Delete the redundant word 'in'.
>
> Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>
Applied,
Thanks,
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> index 748b35c2f0c3..b073ab12e6a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> @@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> /*
> * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
> - * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
> + * reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
> * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
> * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
> * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
Powered by blists - more mailing lists