[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220829131502.165356-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:14:59 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: song@...nel.org
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, yukuai1@...weicloud.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
patch 1 is a small problem found by code review.
patch 2 avoid holding resync_lock in fast path.
patch 3 avoid holding lock in wake_up() in fast path.
Test environment:
Architecture: aarch64
Cpu: Huawei KUNPENG 920, there are four numa nodes
Raid10 initialize:
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level 10 --bitmap none --raid-devices 4 /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1 /dev/nvme3n1
Test cmd:
fio -name=0 -ioengine=libaio -direct=1 -group_reporting=1 -randseed=2022 -rwmixread=70 -refill_buffers -filename=/dev/md0 -numjobs=16 -runtime=60s -bs=4k -iodepth=256 -rw=randread
Test result:
before this patchset: 2.9 GiB/s
after this patchset: 6.6 Gib/s
Please noted that in kunpeng-920, memory access latency is very bad
accross nodes compare to local node, and in other architecture
performance improvement might not be significant.
Yu Kuai (3):
md/raid10: fix improper BUG_ON() in raise_barrier()
md/raid10: convert resync_lock to use seqlock
md/raid10: prevent unnecessary calls to wake_up() in fast path
drivers/md/raid10.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/md/raid10.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists