lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220829115904.28560-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:59:04 +0800
From:   Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
To:     <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <bristot@...hat.com>,
        <vschneid@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Skip meaningless bw updates in dl_task_offline_migration

Skip meaningless bw updates on root domain if task still stay in same rd
while calling dl_task_offline_migration.

Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
---
changes in v2:
- fix subject and comment message
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 8e14dc21d829..9660e166c8ec 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -714,20 +714,22 @@ static struct rq *dl_task_offline_migration(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p
 		add_rq_bw(&p->dl, &later_rq->dl);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * And we finally need to fixup root_domain(s) bandwidth accounting,
-	 * since p is still hanging out in the old (now moved to default) root
-	 * domain.
-	 */
-	dl_b = &rq->rd->dl_bw;
-	raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
-	__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpumask_weight(rq->rd->span));
-	raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+	if (&rq->rd != &later_rq->rd) {
+		/*
+		 * And we finally need to fixup root_domain(s) bandwidth accounting,
+		 * since p is still hanging out in the old (now moved to default) root
+		 * domain.
+		 */
+		dl_b = &rq->rd->dl_bw;
+		raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
+		__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpumask_weight(rq->rd->span));
+		raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
 
-	dl_b = &later_rq->rd->dl_bw;
-	raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
-	__dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpumask_weight(later_rq->rd->span));
-	raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+		dl_b = &later_rq->rd->dl_bw;
+		raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
+		__dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpumask_weight(later_rq->rd->span));
+		raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+	}
 
 	set_task_cpu(p, later_rq->cpu);
 	double_unlock_balance(later_rq, rq);
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ