[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwzwkdAZwNTBQ3gh@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:00:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: property: Use acpi_dev_parent()
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 06:12:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> After introducing acpi_dev_parent() in commit 62fcb99bdf10 ("ACPI: Drop
> parent field from struct acpi_device"), it is better to use it instead
> of accessing the dev.parent field in struct acpi_device directly.
>
> Modify acpi_node_get_parent() accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks!
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/property.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/property.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -1269,10 +1269,11 @@ acpi_node_get_parent(const struct fwnode
> return to_acpi_data_node(fwnode)->parent;
> }
> if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
> - struct device *dev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode)->dev.parent;
> + struct acpi_device *parent;
>
> - if (dev)
> - return acpi_fwnode_handle(to_acpi_device(dev));
> + parent = acpi_dev_parent(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));
> + if (parent)
> + return acpi_fwnode_handle(parent);
> }
>
> return NULL;
>
>
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists