Message-ID: <Ywz4KEkJwrE4yDBe@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:32:24 +0000
From:   William McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/20] PCI: dwc: Add Baikal-T1 PCIe controller support

On 08/29/2022, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> [+Robin, Will - please jump to DMA mask set-up]
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 09:47:01PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Baikal-T1 SoC is equipped with DWC PCIe v4.60a host controller. It can be
> > trained to work up to Gen.3 speed over up to x4 lanes. The host controller
> > is attached to the DW PCIe 3.0 PCS via the PIPE-4 interface, which in its
> > turn is connected to the DWC 10G PHY. The whole system is supposed to be
> > fed up with four clock sources: DBI peripheral clock, AXI application
> > clocks and external PHY/core reference clock generating the 100MHz signal.
> > In addition to that the platform provide a way to reset each part of the
> > controller: sticky/non-sticky bits, host controller core, PIPE interface,
> > PCS/PHY and Hot/Power reset signal. The driver also provides a way to
> > handle the GPIO-based PERST# signal.
> > 
> > Note due to the Baikal-T1 MMIO peculiarity we have to implement the DBI
> > interface accessors which make sure the IO operations are dword-aligned.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changelog v2:
> > - Rename 'syscon' property to 'baikal,bt1-syscon'.
> > 
> > Changelog v3:
> > - Use the clocks/resets handlers defined in the DW PCIe core descriptor.
> >   (@Rob)
> > - Redefine PCI host bridge config space accessors with the generic
> >   pci_generic_config_read32() and pci_generic_config_write32() methods.
> >   (@Rob)
> > 
> > Changelog v4:
> > - Drop PCIBIOS_* macros usage. (@Rob)
> > - Add "static const" to the dw_pcie_ops and dw_pcie_host_ops structure
> >   instances. (@Bjorn)
> > - Rename bt1_pcie_dw_ops to bt1_pcie_ops. (@Bjorn)
> > - Rename bt1_pcie_ops to bt1_pci_ops. (@Bjorn)
> > - Use start_link/stop_link suffixes in the corresponding callbacks.
> >   (@Bjorn)
> > - Change the get_res() method suffix to being get_resources(). (@Bjorn)
> > - Change *_{add,del}_dw_port() method to *_{add,del}_port(). (@Bjorn)
> > - Drop dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() applied to the PCI host bridge
> >   kernel device instance. (@Bjorn)
> > - Add the comment above the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() method usage
> >   regarding the controller eDMA feature. (@Bjorn)
> > - Fix the comment above the core reset controls assertion. (@Bjorn)
> > - Replace delays and timeout numeric literals with macros. (@Bjorn)
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig    |   9 +
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile   |   1 +
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c | 653 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 663 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > index 62ce3abf0f19..771b8b146623 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > @@ -222,6 +222,15 @@ config PCIE_ARTPEC6_EP
> >  	  Enables support for the PCIe controller in the ARTPEC-6 SoC to work in
> >  	  endpoint mode. This uses the DesignWare core.
> >  
> > +config PCIE_BT1
> > +	tristate "Baikal-T1 PCIe controller"
> > +	depends on MIPS_BAIKAL_T1 || COMPILE_TEST
> > +	depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> > +	select PCIE_DW_HOST
> > +	help
> > +	  Enables support for the PCIe controller in the Baikal-T1 SoC to work
> > +	  in host mode. It's based on the Synopsys DWC PCIe v4.60a IP-core.
> > +
> >  config PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST
> >  	bool "Rockchip DesignWare PCIe controller"
> >  	select PCIE_DW
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > index 8ba7b67f5e50..bf5c311875a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST) += pcie-designware-host.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_EP) += pcie-designware-ep.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_PLAT) += pcie-designware-plat.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_BT1) += pcie-bt1.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX) += pci-dra7xx.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pci-exynos.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_FU740) += pcie-fu740.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..86b230575ddc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,653 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 BAIKAL ELECTRONICS, JSC
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + *   Vadim Vlasov <Vadim.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>
> > + *   Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> > + *
> > + * Baikal-T1 PCIe controller driver
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> > +
> > +/* Baikal-T1 System CCU control registers */
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_CLKC			0x140
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_PCS_CLK		BIT(16)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_MAC_CLK		BIT(17)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_PIPE_CLK		BIT(18)
> > +
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_RSTC			0x144
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_LINK_RST		BIT(13)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_SMLH_RST		BIT(14)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_PHY_RST		BIT(16)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_CORE_RST		BIT(24)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_STICKY_RST		BIT(26)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_REQ_NSTICKY_RST		BIT(27)
> > +
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_PMSC			0x148
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_STATE_MASK		GENMASK(5, 0)
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DET_QUIET		0x00
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DET_ACT		0x01
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_POLL_ACT		0x02
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_POLL_COMP		0x03
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_POLL_CONF		0x04
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_PRE_DET_QUIET	0x05
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DET_WAIT		0x06
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNKWD_START	0x07
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNKWD_ACEPT	0x08
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNNUM_WAIT	0x09
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNNUM_ACEPT	0x0a
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_COMPLETE		0x0b
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_IDLE		0x0c
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_LOCK		0x0d
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_SPEED		0x0e
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_RCVRCFG		0x0f
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_IDLE		0x10
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L0			0x11
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L0S			0x12
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L123_SEND_IDLE	0x13
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L1_IDLE		0x14
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE		0x15
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_WAKE		0x16
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DIS_ENTRY		0x17
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DIS_IDLE		0x18
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DISABLE		0x19
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_ENTRY		0x1a
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_ACTIVE		0x1b
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_EXIT		0x1c
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_EXIT_TOUT	0x1d
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_HOT_RST_ENTRY	0x1e
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_HOT_RST		0x1f
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ0		0x20
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ1		0x21
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ2		0x22
> > +#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ3		0x23
> 
> You could make this an enum and define only the states
> that are actually used.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +
> > +/* Generic Baikal-T1 PCIe interface resources */
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_NUM_APP_CLKS			ARRAY_SIZE(bt1_pcie_app_clks)
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_NUM_CORE_CLKS			ARRAY_SIZE(bt1_pcie_core_clks)
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_NUM_APP_RSTS			ARRAY_SIZE(bt1_pcie_app_rsts)
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_NUM_CORE_RSTS			ARRAY_SIZE(bt1_pcie_core_rsts)
> > +
> > +/* PCIe bus setup delays and timeouts */
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_RST_DELAY_MS			100
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_RUN_DELAY_US			100
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_REQ_DELAY_US			1
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_REQ_TIMEOUT_US			1000
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_LNK_DELAY_US			1000
> > +#define BT1_PCIE_LNK_TIMEOUT_US			1000000
> > +
> > +static const enum dw_pcie_app_clk bt1_pcie_app_clks[] = {
> > +	DW_PCIE_DBI_CLK, DW_PCIE_MSTR_CLK, DW_PCIE_SLV_CLK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const enum dw_pcie_core_clk bt1_pcie_core_clks[] = {
> > +	DW_PCIE_REF_CLK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const enum dw_pcie_app_rst bt1_pcie_app_rsts[] = {
> > +	DW_PCIE_MSTR_RST, DW_PCIE_SLV_RST,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const enum dw_pcie_core_rst bt1_pcie_core_rsts[] = {
> > +	DW_PCIE_NON_STICKY_RST, DW_PCIE_STICKY_RST, DW_PCIE_CORE_RST,
> > +	DW_PCIE_PIPE_RST, DW_PCIE_PHY_RST, DW_PCIE_HOT_RST, DW_PCIE_PWR_RST,
> > +};
> 
> I wonder whether we could allocate the rst/clks in DWC dynamically,
> by using these configuration arrays.
> 
> > +
> > +struct bt1_pcie {
> > +	struct dw_pcie dw;
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> > +	struct regmap *sys_regs;
> > +};
> > +#define to_bt1_pcie(_dw) container_of(_dw, struct bt1_pcie, dw)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Baikal-T1 MMIO space must be read/written by the dword-aligned
> > + * instructions. Note the methods are optimized to have the dword operations
> > + * performed with minimum overhead as the most frequently used ones.
> > + */
> > +static int bt1_pcie_read_mmio(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 *val)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int ofs = (uintptr_t)addr & 0x3;
> > +
> > +	if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)addr, size))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	*val = readl(addr - ofs) >> ofs * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> 
> Is it always safe to read more than requested ?
> 
> > +	if (size == 4) {
> > +		return 0;
> > +	} else if (size == 2) {
> > +		*val &= 0xffff;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	} else if (size == 1) {
> > +		*val &= 0xff;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bt1_pcie_write_mmio(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 val)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int ofs = (uintptr_t)addr & 0x3;
> > +	u32 tmp, mask;
> > +
> > +	if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)addr, size))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (size == 4) {
> > +		writel(val, addr);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	} else if (size == 2 || size == 1) {
> > +		mask = GENMASK(size * BITS_PER_BYTE - 1, 0);
> > +		tmp = readl(addr - ofs) & ~(mask << ofs * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> > +		tmp |= (val & mask) << ofs * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> > +		writel(tmp, addr - ofs);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> 
> Same question read/modify/write, is it always safe to do it
> regardless of size ?
> 
> > +
> > +	return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u32 bt1_pcie_read_dbi(struct dw_pcie *pci, void __iomem *base, u32 reg,
> > +			     size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +
> > +	ret = bt1_pcie_read_mmio(base + reg, size, &val);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Read DBI address failed\n");
> > +		return ~0U;
> 
> Is this a special magic value the DWC core is expecting ?
> 
> Does it clash with a _valid_ return value ?
> 
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return val;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void bt1_pcie_write_dbi(struct dw_pcie *pci, void __iomem *base, u32 reg,
> > +			       size_t size, u32 val)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = bt1_pcie_write_mmio(base + reg, size, val);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Write DBI address failed\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void bt1_pcie_write_dbi2(struct dw_pcie *pci, void __iomem *base, u32 reg,
> > +				size_t size, u32 val)
> > +{
> > +	struct bt1_pcie *btpci = to_bt1_pcie(pci);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	regmap_update_bits(btpci->sys_regs, BT1_CCU_PCIE_GENC,
> > +			   BT1_CCU_PCIE_DBI2_MODE, BT1_CCU_PCIE_DBI2_MODE);
> > +
> > +	ret = bt1_pcie_write_mmio(base + reg, size, val);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Write DBI2 address failed\n");
> > +
> > +	regmap_update_bits(btpci->sys_regs, BT1_CCU_PCIE_GENC,
> > +			   BT1_CCU_PCIE_DBI2_MODE, 0);
> 
> IIUC the regmap_update_bits() set up decoding for DBI2. Hopefully the
> DBI/DBI2 writes are sequentialized, this is a question valid also
> for other DWC controllers.
> 
> What I want to say is, the regmap update in this function sets the
> DWC HW in a way that can decode DBI2 (please correct me if I am wrong),
> between the two _update_bits() no DBI access should happen because
> it just would not work.
> 
> It is a question.
> 
> > +static int bt1_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > +	struct bt1_pcie *btpci = to_bt1_pcie(pci);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = bt1_pcie_get_resources(btpci);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	bt1_pcie_full_stop_bus(btpci, true);
> > +
> > +	return bt1_pcie_cold_start_bus(btpci);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void bt1_pcie_host_deinit(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > +	struct bt1_pcie *btpci = to_bt1_pcie(pci);
> > +
> > +	bt1_pcie_full_stop_bus(btpci, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops bt1_pcie_host_ops = {
> > +	.host_init = bt1_pcie_host_init,
> > +	.host_deinit = bt1_pcie_host_deinit,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct bt1_pcie *bt1_pcie_create_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct bt1_pcie *btpci;
> > +
> > +	btpci = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*btpci), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!btpci)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > +	btpci->pdev = pdev;
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, btpci);
> > +
> > +	return btpci;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bt1_pcie_add_port(struct bt1_pcie *btpci)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &btpci->pdev->dev;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * DW PCIe Root Port controller is equipped with eDMA capable of
> > +	 * working with the 64-bit memory addresses.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> 
> Is this the right place to set the DMA mask for the host controller
> embedded DMA controller (actually, the dev pointer is the _host_
> controller device) ?
> 
> How this is going to play when combined with:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1e63a581-14ae-b4b5-a5bf-ca8f09c33af6@arm.com
> 
> It is getting a bit confusing. I believe the code in the link
> above sets the mask so that through the DMA API we are capable
> of getting an MSI doorbell virtual address whose physical address
> can be addressed by the endpoint; this through the DMA API.
> 
> This patch is setting the DMA mask for a different reason, namely
> setting the host controller embedded DMA controller addressing
> capabilities.
> 
> AFAICS - both approaches set the mask for the same device - now
> the question is about which one is legitimate and how to handle
> the other.

Since the mask is being set before calling dw_pcie_host_init() and the
msi_host_init op is not set, setting the mask here won't have any affect due to
the fact that dw_pcie_msi_host_init() unconditionally sets the DMA mask. AFAIK,
you don't technically need a 64-bit address, right? If your platform disables
32-bit allocations, then you'll need to set the MSI capabilities flag to
support a 64-bit allocation for when the 32-bit allocation fails in the host
controller driver.

Here is how I'm doing that with the Exynos PCIe driver during probe before
calling dw_pcie_host_init():

	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(exynos_pcie->pci);
	offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(exynos_pcie->pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
	cap = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(exynos_pcie->pci, offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS);

	/* Enable MSI with 64-bit support */
	cap |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT;
	dw_pcie_writew_dbi(exynos_pcie->pci, offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, cap);
	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(exynos_pcie->pci);

I hope that helps!

Regards,
Will

> 
> > +
> > +	btpci->dw.version = DW_PCIE_VER_460A;
> > +	btpci->dw.dev = dev;
> > +	btpci->dw.ops = &bt1_pcie_ops;
> > +
> > +	btpci->dw.pp.num_vectors = MAX_MSI_IRQS;
> > +	btpci->dw.pp.ops = &bt1_pcie_host_ops;
> > +
> > +	dw_pcie_cap_set(&btpci->dw, REQ_RES);
> > +
> > +	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(&btpci->dw.pp);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize DWC PCIe host\n");
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void bt1_pcie_del_port(struct bt1_pcie *btpci)
> > +{
> > +	dw_pcie_host_deinit(&btpci->dw.pp);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bt1_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct bt1_pcie *btpci;
> > +
> > +	btpci = bt1_pcie_create_data(pdev);
> 
> Do we really need a function for that ? I am not too
> bothered but I think it is overkill.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
> 
> > +	if (IS_ERR(btpci))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(btpci);
> > +
> > +	return bt1_pcie_add_port(btpci);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bt1_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct bt1_pcie *btpci = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	bt1_pcie_del_port(btpci);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id bt1_pcie_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "baikal,bt1-pcie" },
> > +	{},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bt1_pcie_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver bt1_pcie_driver = {
> > +	.probe = bt1_pcie_probe,
> > +	.remove = bt1_pcie_remove,
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name	= "bt1-pcie",
> > +		.of_match_table = bt1_pcie_of_match,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(bt1_pcie_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Baikal-T1 PCIe driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists