[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN0PR12MB610137D56D08C873C7647A9CE2769@MN0PR12MB6101.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:16:45 +0000
From: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add support to ignore programming
an interrupt
[Public]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 12:32
> To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Cc: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>;
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>; linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add support to ignore programming
> an interrupt
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > On 8/3/22 06:24, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > gpiolib-acpi already had support for ignoring a pin for wakeup, but
> > > if an OEM configures a floating pin as an interrupt source then
> > > stopping it from being a wakeup won't do much good to stop the
> > > interrupt storm.
> > >
> > > Add support for a module parameter and quirk infrastructure to
> > > ignore interrupts as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> >
> > Thanks, patch looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
Andy,
Just to double check, you meant you took both patches, not just the first right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists