linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,rpmcc: Add compatible for SM6375

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:04:08 -0500
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,rpmcc: Add compatible for
 SM6375

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 08:30:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/07/2022 21:27, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > Add a compatible for RPMCC on SM6375.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> > index 9d296b89a8d0..f22febdfdce7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
> >            - qcom,rpmcc-sdm660
> >            - qcom,rpmcc-sm6115
> >            - qcom,rpmcc-sm6125
> > +          - qcom,sm6375-rpmcc
> 
> I am fine with it, although this contradicts a bit
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220705161301.493364-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> 
> Would be nice to get Bjorn's opinion/preference on this.
> 

While global consistency is nice, I think we should just stick with
qcom,rpmcc-<soc>, to keep this binding nice and tidy.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof