linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] gpio: mockup: remove gpio debugfs when remove device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:15:36 +0800
From:   "weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC:     Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] gpio: mockup: remove gpio debugfs when remove
 device

Hi Bart,

On 2022/8/28 22:00, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 3:27 PM weiyongjun (A) <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bart,
>>
>> On 2022/8/19 20:49, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:34 PM Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> GPIO mockup debugfs is created in gpio_mockup_probe() but
>>>> forgot to remove when remove device. This patch add a devm
>>>> managed callback for removing them.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The tag -next is for patches that address issues that are in next but
>>> not yet in master.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This isn't very relevant as the module needs to be unloaded anyway in
>>> order to reconfigure the simulated device but I'll apply it as it's
>>> technically correct. Did you see we have a new one - gpio-sim - that
>>> uses configfs?
>>>
>>> Bart
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am using gpio-mockup as a interrupt-controller with the change[1],
>> it works will with overfs dts[2], and can success mockup device and
>> trigger the irq. But when switch to gpio-sim, device can not be created
>> by dts[3]. Not sure what's wrong with it. Any suggestion?
>>
> 
> I see you submitted a patch series for gpio-sim - does it fix this issue?


Yes, after that patch series, gpio-sim works well in my use case.

Thanks,
Wei Yongjun