[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e278dc5-35e6-2872-3255-52f38d1670e5@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:52:54 +0800
From: xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
To: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
CC: <mic@...ikod.net>, <paul@...l-moore.com>, <jmorris@...ei.org>,
<serge@...lyn.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 6/6] landlock: update chmod and chown support in
document
Hi,
在 2022/8/28 1:28, Günther Noack 写道:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:12:15PM +0800, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
>> update LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_{CHMOD, CHGRP} support and add abi change
>> in the document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> index 2509c2fbf98f..0e97a7998fa1 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> @@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ the need to be explicit about the denied-by-default access rights.
>> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK |
>> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM |
>> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
>> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE,
>> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE |
>> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_CHMOD |
>> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_CHGRP
>> };
>>
>> Because we may not know on which kernel version an application will be
>> @@ -90,6 +92,11 @@ the ABI.
>> case 2:
>> /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE for ABI < 3 */
>> ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE;
>> + __attribute__((fallthrough));
>> + case 3:
>> + /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_{CHMOD, CHGRP} for ABI < 4 */
>> + ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_CHMOD |
>> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_CHGRP);
>> }
>>
>> This enables to create an inclusive ruleset that will contain our rules.
>
> There is a sentence just above this code example that neesd updating as well.
>
Get it, it's the follwing sentence, thanks.
...
Let's check if we should
remove the `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER` or `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`
access
rights, which are only supported starting with the second and third
version of
the ABI.
...
> --
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists