[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwyDUm+dS7OLTo2h@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:13:54 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/30] phy: qcom,qmp: fix dt-bindings and deprecate
lane suffix
Hi Vinod,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:17:36PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > When adding support for SC8280XP to the QMP PHY driver I noticed that
> > the PHY provider child node was not described by the current DT schema.
> >
> > The SC8280XP PHYs also need a second fixed-divider PIPE clock
> > ("pipediv2") and I didn't want to have to add a bogus "lane" suffix to
> > the clock name just to match the current "pipe0" name so I decided to
> > deprecate the unnecessary suffix in the current binding instead.
> >
> > To be able to add the missing child-node schema and handle device
> > specifics like additional PIPE clocks, it quickly became obvious that
> > the binding needs to be split up.
> >
> > This series clean up and fixes some issue with the current schema before
> > splitting it up in separate schemas for PCIe, UFS and USB and adding
> > missing parts like the child PHY provider nodes.
> >
> > The MSM8996 PCIe PHY gets its own schema as this is the only non-combo
> > PHY that actually provides more than one PHY per IP block. Note that the
> > "lane" suffix is still unnecessary and misleading.
> >
> > The final patches add support for the updated binding to the (recently
> > split up) PHY drivers. Included is also a related combo PHY cleanup.
>
> Hi Vinod,
>
> any chance of getting these into 5.20?
>
> Note that there'll be an -rc8 on Sunday.
Have you had a chance to look at this series yet?
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists