[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jwnartm78.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:46:20 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/6] clk: meson: S4: add support for Amlogic S4 SoC
PLL clock driver
On Mon 15 Aug 2022 at 14:34, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On 2022/8/10 21:47, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>> On Fri 05 Aug 2022 at 16:57, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
>> */
[... ]
>>> +#define ANACTRL_FIXPLL_CTRL0 (0x0010 << 2)
>> I already commented on the "<< 2" . Remove them please.
> Sorry, maybe I didn't pay attention to this comment earlier. A little bit
> of a question why is this not okay? I understand isn't it better for the
> compiler to help with this calculation itself?
Because it is aweful to read
Also please trim your replies.
It is a bit annoying to search for your comments in the replies
Powered by blists - more mailing lists