| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220829105810.225774587@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:58:04 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 034/158] net/mlx5: Avoid false positive lockdep warning by adding lock_class_key
From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
[ Upstream commit d59b73a66e5e0682442b6d7b4965364e57078b80 ]
Add a lock_class_key per mlx5 device to avoid a false positive
"possible circular locking dependency" warning by lockdep, on flows
which lock more than one mlx5 device, such as adding SF.
kernel log:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc8+ #2 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u20:0/8 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88812dfe0d98 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888101aa7898 (&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x130
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x90/0x150
blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x53/0xa0
mlx5_sf_table_init+0x369/0x4a0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_init_one+0x261/0x490 [mlx5_core]
probe_one+0x430/0x680 [mlx5_core]
local_pci_probe+0xd6/0x170
work_for_cpu_fn+0x4e/0xa0
process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340
worker_thread+0x6f6/0xec0
kthread+0x28f/0x330
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #0 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x2fc7/0x6720
lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550
__mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0
mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_sf_dev_probe+0x29c/0x370 [mlx5_core]
auxiliary_bus_probe+0x9d/0xe0
really_probe+0x1e0/0xaa0
__driver_probe_device+0x219/0x480
driver_probe_device+0x49/0x130
__device_attach_driver+0x1b8/0x280
bus_for_each_drv+0x123/0x1a0
__device_attach+0x1a3/0x460
bus_probe_device+0x1a2/0x260
device_add+0x9b1/0x1b40
__auxiliary_device_add+0x88/0xc0
mlx5_sf_dev_state_change_handler+0x67e/0x9d0 [mlx5_core]
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xd5/0x130
mlx5_vhca_state_work_handler+0x2b0/0x3f0 [mlx5_core]
process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340
worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0
kthread+0x28f/0x330
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem);
lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
lock(&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem);
lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by kworker/u20:0/8:
#0: ffff888150612938 ((wq_completion)mlx5_events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x6e2/0x1340
#1: ffff888100cafdb8 ((work_completion)(&work->work)#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340
#2: ffff888101aa7898 (&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x130
#3: ffff88813682d0e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at:__device_attach+0x76/0x460
stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u20:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: mlx5_events mlx5_vhca_state_work_handler [mlx5_core]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
check_noncircular+0x278/0x300
? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460
? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20
? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880
__lock_acquire+0x2fc7/0x6720
? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880
? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880
lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550
? mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core]
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400
__mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0
? mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core]
? _raw_read_unlock+0x1f/0x30
? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320
? __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x306/0x490
? mlx5_sf_dev_probe+0x269/0x370 [mlx5_core]
? iounmap+0x160/0x160
mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_sf_dev_probe+0x29c/0x370 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_sf_dev_remove+0x130/0x130 [mlx5_core]
auxiliary_bus_probe+0x9d/0xe0
really_probe+0x1e0/0xaa0
__driver_probe_device+0x219/0x480
? auxiliary_match_id+0xe9/0x140
driver_probe_device+0x49/0x130
__device_attach_driver+0x1b8/0x280
? driver_allows_async_probing+0x140/0x140
bus_for_each_drv+0x123/0x1a0
? bus_for_each_dev+0x1a0/0x1a0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2d/0x100
__device_attach+0x1a3/0x460
? device_driver_attach+0x1e0/0x1e0
? kobject_uevent_env+0x22d/0xf10
bus_probe_device+0x1a2/0x260
device_add+0x9b1/0x1b40
? dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0
? __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x260/0x260
? memset+0x20/0x40
? lockdep_init_map_type+0x21a/0x7d0
__auxiliary_device_add+0x88/0xc0
? auxiliary_device_init+0x86/0xa0
mlx5_sf_dev_state_change_handler+0x67e/0x9d0 [mlx5_core]
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xd5/0x130
mlx5_vhca_state_work_handler+0x2b0/0x3f0 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_vhca_event_arm+0x100/0x100 [mlx5_core]
? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400
process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230
? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0
? process_one_work+0x1340/0x1340
kthread+0x28f/0x330
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: 6a3273217469 ("net/mlx5: SF, Port function state change support")
Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 4 ++++
include/linux/mlx5/driver.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
index ba2e5232b90be..616207c3b187a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
@@ -1472,7 +1472,9 @@ int mlx5_mdev_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int profile_idx)
memcpy(&dev->profile, &profile[profile_idx], sizeof(dev->profile));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->ctx_list);
spin_lock_init(&priv->ctx_lock);
+ lockdep_register_key(&dev->lock_key);
mutex_init(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
+ lockdep_set_class(&dev->intf_state_mutex, &dev->lock_key);
mutex_init(&priv->bfregs.reg_head.lock);
mutex_init(&priv->bfregs.wc_head.lock);
@@ -1527,6 +1529,7 @@ int mlx5_mdev_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int profile_idx)
mutex_destroy(&priv->bfregs.wc_head.lock);
mutex_destroy(&priv->bfregs.reg_head.lock);
mutex_destroy(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&dev->lock_key);
return err;
}
@@ -1545,6 +1548,7 @@ void mlx5_mdev_uninit(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
mutex_destroy(&priv->bfregs.wc_head.lock);
mutex_destroy(&priv->bfregs.reg_head.lock);
mutex_destroy(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&dev->lock_key);
}
static int probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
index 5040cd774c5a3..b0b4ac92354a2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
@@ -773,6 +773,7 @@ struct mlx5_core_dev {
enum mlx5_device_state state;
/* sync interface state */
struct mutex intf_state_mutex;
+ struct lock_class_key lock_key;
unsigned long intf_state;
struct mlx5_priv priv;
struct mlx5_profile profile;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists