[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220829105814.907576893@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:59:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 139/158] x86/nospec: Fix i386 RSB stuffing
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit 332924973725e8cdcc783c175f68cf7e162cb9e5 upstream.
Turns out that i386 doesn't unconditionally have LFENCE, as such the
loop in __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER isn't actually speculation safe on such
chips.
Fixes: ba6e31af2be9 ("x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence")
Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yv9tj9vbQ9nNlXoY@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
* the optimal version - two calls, each with their own speculation
* trap should their return address end up getting used, in a loop.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
#define __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(reg, nr) \
mov $(nr/2), reg; \
771: \
@@ -60,6 +61,17 @@
jnz 771b; \
/* barrier for jnz misprediction */ \
lfence;
+#else
+/*
+ * i386 doesn't unconditionally have LFENCE, as such it can't
+ * do a loop.
+ */
+#define __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(reg, nr) \
+ .rept nr; \
+ __FILL_RETURN_SLOT; \
+ .endr; \
+ add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * nr, %_ASM_SP;
+#endif
/*
* Stuff a single RSB slot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists